The Alt-Right

Positions, beliefs, and my objections towards them.

Do you know what's worse than having someone who knows nothing of the truth?
Having someone who knows only half the truth, but thinks he knows the whole truth.

For the past few years, we here in the west have had to contend with a movement that, while having the foresight to point out many of the left's flaws, have many, many flaws of their own. For every time they rightfully call out the left for double-standards, hypocrisy, and destructive behavior, they engage in their own brand of double-standards, hypocrisy, and destructive behavior. For every time they call out the left on identity politics, they engage in identity politics of their own.

I am talking, of course, about the Alt-Right. The movement that sprung off as an alternative to traditional conservative outlets, who sought to fight the left their own way. Originally, it was a good idea. The traditional conservative forces have had a bit of a decline since the era of the second President Bush, and the time seemed ripe for a movement to emerge to point out the weaknesses and flaws of liberalism while not being bogged down by the baggage of the old right.

And the old right has many flaws of its own, believe me. Attacking innocuous things like Dungeons and Dragons and Harry Potter as demonic, attacking video games for being "violence simulators", lending support to a creationist theory of human origins that even many Christians find to be bizarre, the old right has many flaws that can quite justifiably cause many people of conservative leanings to seek out an alternative instead of being tied to a sinking boat.

And as for the left, hoo-boy, did they leave themselves open to attack. Feminists who decry that video games are sexist, even while ignoring real sexism in the Middle East. Social Justice Warriors who will toss the insults of "racist, sexist, homophobic" at anyone who even remotely disagrees with them. This was patronized and even assisted by the old guard socialist leftists, who used their media contacts to promote this sort of thinking. Games Journalism websites who are owned by liberal parent companies decried the very gamers who were their customers as sexist pigs. Big-named organizations and individuals like the UN and Steven Colbert gave feminists like Anita Sarkeesian their time and publicity. The left became a parody of itself. Instead of helping the citizens be free of moralistic control by the right, they became an even bigger moralist than the right could ever hope for, driving many into the arms of the alt-right. I would even say that part of the reason for the rise of the alt-right was because of how the left practically drove off any voice of modernity within their side.

But of course, it didn't take long for the alt-right to become a parody as well. At first, it started off as a place where people disassociating themselves from both the traditional right and left were able to voice their concerns. Reasonable concerns, like how both the right and the left supports censorship of speech that disagreed with them. Or how one tries to censor sexuality in video games, the other tries to censor sexuality in other forms of media. During the dawn of the media blitz known as "Gamergate", where a feminist game maker was caught trading sex for good reviews from game journalists, the alt-right seemed like a heroic effort; a place where people can complain about the liberal corruption of the media and society at large without aligning oneself to the currently-unpopular traditional right that was exemplified by outlets like Fox News and groups like the Republican Party. But then, worms started to show up in the apple, and it was obvious that if the alt-right was a cure for the disease of political correctness and stagnation, the cure was worse than the disease.

Eventually, after Gamergate simmered down, more radical groups of alt-right began to show their faces. Alt-right individuals with racist undertones began to move from criticizing affirmative action to outright classifying non-whites as lower IQ people who are close to subhuman. Similarly, some of them also went from criticizing the negative effects of the excesses of feminism to outright saying that women cannot be trusted to act responsibly, that things like handling money and choosing when to have careers, finances, or boyfriends was too complex for their "simple minds". They began to echo the sentiments of sexists and racists from ages past, who saw blacks as too stupid to understand things and who saw women as too emotional and irresponsible.

Of course, as a man of the real world, I can personally attest that what they say is bullshit: I've seen many responsible women handle things like jobs, money, and men just fine. I've seen blacks and other minority kids who make me feel like a fellow geek again because of how much they know academically. But these genuinely racist and sexist individuals tried to push their agenda as an evolution of the protests against the excesses of the left, even talking about how the Civil Rights Act of the 60's was a bad idea and how treating minorities and women with the same respect one gives to white men is tantamount to a betrayal of traditionalist principles.

This is, of course, not the end of the problems. Many of the alt-right constantly blast women and feminism for the increasing tide of female promiscuity, and yet the alt-right is littered with hustlers and pick-up artists who try to give dating advice to men to constantly have pick-up sex with chicks. In the morning, they bash women and female promiscuity, citing it as a definite symptom of these women having a lack of moral restraint. At night, they make use of said promiscuity for cheap thrills. They can't admit to the fact that they're just as much prostitutes as these women. The only difference is the genitals. Oh, wait, no, prostitute would be a misnomer. Not all prostitutes have such burning hatred for their clients.

All the while these idiots complain about a so-called "white genocide", a supposedly "engineered" campaign by politically-correct governments to render white people extinct. This despite the fact that most white populations in the world that have experienced a population drop did so because of contraception and abortion being legalized; it's just more convenient for the average westerner to live the life of casual sex and not have kids, so the net result is, quite predictably, a lot less kids, and a lower population.

They use excuses like the "white genocide" argument to justify cutting off immigration entirely aside from purely white countries. They call nonwhite, but especially black and Arab migrants "uncivilized", not caring about the individual content of each person. Yes, there have been a rise in migrant attacks by predominantly MUSLIM migrants, but such assailants are easy to ferret out, especially when they wear their Jihadi credentials on their sleeve and make a big deal about their faith more than the average, quiet Muslim. It's easier for them to attack other factors like liberal politicians or nonwhite migrants instead of addressing the real issue-the fact that most of them don't have families.

But to these alt-right folks, the idea of settling down with a family is "being cucked". What does that mean, you ask? Well, to put it bluntly, being a "cuck" is being someone's bitch. The word has something to do with a man who likes to see his wife get railed by another man of a different racial background, but for expediency's sake, it just means "bitch" in alt-right lingo. So, to these alt-right edge-lords, being a family man is the equivalent to being a Jim Crow slave. They'd rather spend their days, whoring around, instead of finding a good woman to procreate with.

And it's not like there's a lack of alt-right women out there. Just as with any movement, there's gonna be cheerleaders, and there's enough alt-right women who agree with their views on race that they can settle down with. They can easily go to hillbilly country and find nice white girls to bed and raise a family with. But oh, no, that's too much effort. To some of these alt-right manly men, giving up the life of whoring is too much. For others, they see the alt-right women as "fakes" who only want to whore out to alt-right men. There's just no winning with them, is there? It's quite funny. They attack women for caring too much about careers, and not settling down and having a husband and children, but at the end of the day, similar to their sexual habitats, it seems that alt-right men are just as guilty as women for putting off family and child-rearing for the sake of their careers or ambitions.

Of course, they will try to justify this, saying that men are built to work and have kids later in life when compared to women. But really, is that an excuse? Men, or should we say, boys, get hot and horny around the same time girls do. They hit puberty around the same time, they develop more advanced sex organs at the same time, and they experiment with sex around the same range of years, from early teenage years to early adult years. Of course, to an alt-right person, those years are better spent whoring around with the very same women they hate. Girls whom they derisively call "sluts" while at the same time enjoying their slutty company. Y'know, at least liberal man-whores are honest about wanting to have a free-wheeling sexual paradise where boys and girls are free to experiment. I don't agree with everything liberals do, but at least I can appreciate their blunt honesty.

And what does it say about the girls whom they deflower? Does it not add to the "degeneracy" of the culture that they're so intent in cursing out? Half the time they're angry at the "degenerate" women for dumping the "good boys" and sticking with bad-boy baby daddies, but in trying to seduce women with "game" tactics, aren't they just as bad? Are they not encouraging the same slut-dom and degeneracy that they hate in women? And what happens to the girls who do get played around? The alt-right doesn't see them as marriage material. Mostly, they're just there to play. So what happens after the big moment? Ah, well, just dump them with the rest of the sluts that we hate, right? Right. Human dignity? What's that? It's quite telling that these alt-right men will never consider for marriage women who have had past sexual relationships, and yet, they don't care that they're de-valuing the women who are giving them the time of day.

Again, this is where I compare them to another set of deviants who actually look more humane than they do. In this case: the people who find their joys pleasuring themselves with the written word and images, both drawn and photographed. Yes, it does have an effect on the mind, especially with porn, but the difference between a guy who whacks off to anime and a guy who rails and dumps a girl is that the former does less damage than the latter. The former keeps his deflowering to himself, and only himself. He does not affect anyone outside himself. The latter, however, damages both himself and another human being. What if that girl was saving herself for something else but then some guy managed to seduce her? Shall we blame her and her alone? Or shall we not put on our objectivity goggles and blame both the tempter and the tempted? At least God made the Serpent crawl on its belly after it tempted Eve and Adam to make that mistake in the Garden of Eden. A guy who orgasms to words, still images, or videos is the equivalent of someone getting drunk. His liver is going to hate him for it, but he's only hurting himself. A guy who pumps and dumps girls like toilet paper is the equivalent of a drunk driver crashing into several houses with a monster truck, killing people left and right.

And yes, the alt-right loves to blast boys who get their sexual joys off of porn and anime and sex-themed fanfiction. They call these boys out as failures in life. They look at boys who enjoy having strong female characters in video games and see them as effeminate simps. They yell at these guys to go out there and bang some real chicks. But for what? To start a family? Hell no. Family is for cucks, remember? No, just continue whoring and making girls feel bad about themselves. Be an "alpha male" who bangs girls just to reinforce your own feelings of self-worth. It's not like you're engaging in destructive behavior just to boost your own ego, isn't it? Again, these alt-righters call out women for indulging in "destructive behavior" to make themselves feel better; they see these women as playing men along just so they can feel important. But aren't these alt-right men doing the same thing? Banging sluts to make themselves feel like men? Any ponce can walk up to a girl high on hormones and persuade her to drop her pants and make with the uglies. A real man can get a woman to be loyal to him for a long period of time, build her a house, and help her take care of and raise the kids. But of course, that's just for cucks, so, moving on along.

One place where the alt-right's racist marks showed itself was during the split between the more race-based corner of the alt-right, against the sex-based one. The more race-based part was obsessed with keeping the white race "pure" and despising all mixed-race breeding. The sex-based half was more concerned with honing "game" tactics to seduce women while at the same time, blasting them for "sexual degeneracy". This group was attacking women for going with the bad boys, while training to be the same bad boys themselves. (Hilarious, I know.) However, the sex-based wing, also known as "the Manosphere", was led by a guy named Roosh V. What's the problem? Roosh V was a Persian immigrant, who constantly writes books on how to bang EUROPEAN girls. See the picture? So, in the defense of white women against this monstrous Persian threat came the more race-based part of the alt-right, who attacked and expelled Roosh and his associates from the alt-right for promoting interracial sex. Other associates of his have promoted the idea of getting girls from Asia because they're more "respective" of a man's authority. (Reality check: they're not. They seem nicer than most western women, but when married to a man, they will have the same high expectations)

And the sad part here is that I found myself agreeing with the blasted racists, of all people, on this part, because they actually looked like they cared about women in that small struggle. The race-based part of the alt-right complained that they cannot, in good conscience, support a man like Roosh V, because while they're preaching about the purity of the white race, Roosh is out there, making whores out of white girls, and telling people how to seduce more of them. I thoroughly detest the racist part of the alt-right. But the fact that they actually realized that what Roosh is doing is damaging their prospects for a white nation is what finally drove them to cut him and his associates from their group. Sadly, it was because they were racists. If Roosh was a white man, born in Europe or in white parts of America, they probably wouldn't have cared. The one time these racists actually had a good thought in their brains, and it was because of their deeply flawed biases.

Alt-right politics, as you would probably expect, is a whole miasma regarding world affairs. It's even worse than Alex Jones. But a brief introduction is necessary: to the alt-right, all of politics boils down to two things: race, and the banks. If a government has a central bank, or has tolerance for other races, or worse, BOTH, then it's controlled by the Globalists/Jews/Illuminati and it's pure evil. It's really that simple for them. Forget about extenuating political circumstances like recent history, political expediency, or other such concerns, it's just all about evil Globalist/Illuminati control that denigrates the white race and puts all the world's finances under one system.

Never mind that having one financial system for an increasingly connected world is something that's convenient for international trade and everyone involved in it. Never mind that bankers, like everyone else, are political animals and obviously wind up supporting one side or another in exchange for favors. I mean, back during the Renaissance, Europe had banking families like the Medicis and the Fuggers, CHRISTIAN banking families, who wound up supporting different dynastic concerns. The Fuggers supported the Hapsburg candidate for Holy Roman Emperor in the 1520's by buying out the electors in the Empire, and the Medicis married into the French royal house of Bourbon. Why would modern bankers supporting different causes be all that different now? Bankers obviously have two things on their minds all day: increasing profits and making good on investments. Politics and trade, like other things, are just another stepping stone to that. If they can create one universal financial system to organize the world's finances and wealth, then it makes things convenient for them. Which of course, would make that a desirable thing for them. The alt-right takes this basic, animalistic urge of the banks and tries to spin it as an evil conspiracy.

It's quite weird to me, that if these alt-right edge-lords are correct and they figured out the evil globalist masterminds, that they haven't been assassinated yet. They constantly speak, day in and day out, against the actions of these so-called evil globalists who control the world, from denigrating masculinity, promoting racial equality, to taking control of the world's finances. If they're correct, then by all means, these guys would have been assassinated long ago. What kind of evil overlord doesn't cover their tracks? I mean, in Star Wars, when Palpatine gets a suspicion that someone figured out that the Clone Wars was one big hoax, he orders their demise, through direct or indirect purposes. I mean, if I was an evil overlord, and I spent billions of dollars putting all these pieces together for some sinister grand master plan, and some chump starts yelling about it and threatens to expose me, I'd have him meet with an "accident" sometime soon. Most of these alt-right edge-lords are despised by both the left and the right, so them meeting with an unfortunate accident on the road would be something that both the right and the left would just shrug off as an accident, or even a fortunate coincidence.

I can tell you why they haven't been assassinated yet: because they're better advertisements for their enemies than any propaganda made to promote a side. They're not necessarily Princess Leia and Han Solo here. I mean, if I was an evil mastermind, and my opposition are a bunch of hypocritical, racist, and sexist twats, then all I need to do is point at them and expose what they do, then say that I'm the opposite side as them. If these guys are correct about things like the globalists, the Illuminati, or the Jews, then one reason to explain why they haven't been killed by the CIA or by Mossad agents is because having an opposition that reeks of the stench of bigotry and hypocrisy is the best advertisement for your side. If the alt-right are the Jedi, then sign me on for the Sith, give me my armored black robes and red lightsabers, and let's go Jedi-hunting. And if the alt-right is wrong on this regard, then the globalists look even better, because not only are the opposition bigots, but morons, to boot. So if the world is being taken over by an evil cabal, then all the alt-right is doing is playing into their hands by being the very image of a rancid opposition force that is racist, sexist, and hypocritical.

Speaking of which, the alt-right's political blindness ties into their historical blindness. They see the past as a Garden of Eden, a bastion against political correctness, and it was because we went against the wisdom of racial discrimination, not allowing women to vote, and barring immigrants from entry into the country that our country is now in a sinkhole. Never mind that in the 1800s, the so-called titans of industry that the alt-right loves to boot-lick as paragons of capitalism invited scores of immigrants to the country for cheap labor. Never mind that the women's suffrage movement had the backing of Churches and the traditional religious elite because back then, women were very religious. Never mind that racial equality was not only something that Christianity taught, but also was spearheaded by clerics of many denominations.

The alt-right are also blind to the fact that capitalists support immigration (legal or not) feminism, and that greater freedom for corporations means greater freedom for feminism and a larger open gate towards immigrants, legal or illegal. Who do you think benefits from cheap labor brought by illegal immigrants? The local Mom & Pop stores? Nope. Large corporations who want cheap, malleable labor do. And kicking out the immigrants to deprive them of cheap labor means they'll just set up shop outside the country and hire cheap laborers from lands like Vietnam or Mexico. Feminism helps these capitalists double the labor pool by getting women into the workplace, which means they have more options for labor. The larger the labor market, the less they have to pay the average worker, because there's always someone willing to work for a lower price. The very same laissez-faire capitalism that the alt-right loves to worship is the very same cause for their woes on feminism and immigrants. These capitalists don't want a homogenous labor force from an ethnicity whose birth numbers are getting lower. They want a large, industrious labor force from many ethnicities on both sides of the sex line, so they have as much options as possible. But of course, the alt-right is too busy worshiping at the statues of Ayn Rand and Adam Smith to even notice these things, so let's move on to the next topic.

Last, but not least, is religion. And if you thought their views on race and sex were weird, get a load of how they see faith. Like most of Christendom today, they are divided between Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestants. Unlike the rest of Christendom, which has embraced racial equality and treats wrongs by both men and women as the same, they adapted their own twisted belief systems into the Christian creed, throwing out those inconvenient passages, like the one talking about how all Christians are united despite their race, or how Christ constantly demanded the rich to give to the poor, instead it's a convenient Christianity of white supremacy, one which is only used as a battering ram against the left and against the SJWs. It isn't a genuine faith, from what I could gather, but a political lightning rod. Any time a religious figure like Pope Francis quotes scripture and tries to get people to help the poor or rise above their biases to embrace their fellow man in the name of God, he's seen as a tool of the Jewish/Globalist/Illuminati elite, no matter how many times he speaks out against modernist ideas like gender identity reassignment. To them, the only genuine faith is one that lives up to their own ideals. One that looks away while they go around like man-whores, but rises up to condemn the women when they whore themselves out.

And I'll admit: this was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I had acquaintances in the alt-right whom I considered friends, and many times, I tolerated their racist and sexist behaviors and tirades because they gave a very well-reasoned critique of the left here and then. But it was in one debate when I finally saw that these guys could not be saved. I thought that their positive leanings towards Christianity would at least temper their hate and inevitably lead them down the right path, but I discovered that their beliefs on race and sex overrides any loyalty they publicly proclaim to Lord Jesus Christ.

I was online, talking with a bunch of them, about the Refugee Crisis concerning Syria's refugees. Many of them obviously advocated a closed-door policy when it came to refugees. I then talked about how we should open our gates to at least the CHRISTIAN refugees as well, since ISIS doesn't treat Christians well and I thought that the West could open its doors to a persecuted faith as well as re-energize its own Christianity by helping in these Christian refugees. I even gave them a half-compromise-let's send the Muslim refugees to other Muslim countries where they'll have an easier time fitting in with their coreligionists, but let's accept the Christians because the West is still somewhat Christian. I thought, that since we were Christians, that we should at least open the gates to Christian refugees, and I thought that these alt-righters, being fellow Christians, would agree. Boy was I wrong.

Immediately they rejected the idea. "NO KEBABS" they said out loud. Never mind that these refugees were fellow Christians. Never mind that their lives were in danger from ISIS. Never mind that the Gospel and the New Testament tried to paint the Christian community as transcending race and class. No, to these alt-right dogs, "Kebab" is "Kebab", no matter how Christian they may be, they're still the unter-menschen. To them, these Christian refugees are still scum that will pollute the great white paradise that is Europe and America. And here was the hypocrisy of the alt-right laid bare: people who profess to be "Christian" promoting the idea that they should abandon other Christians to their death, just because they were "Kebabs" and were not of the right skin color.

That was when I finally severed my connections with them, and I became an enemy of theirs. These alt-righters want me to be their enemy? Fine. I will be their enemy. They wish to oppose GOD on matters of race? Well, fine, that's going to haunt their souls in hell. Last time I checked, God only had one heaven and one hell in mind. Their poisonous thoughts are the kind that can and will lead them to hell eventually. Even if they go to heaven, they'll be eternally tormented by the presence of blacks, Asians, Middle-Easterners, and Latinos in paradise. It'll be a form of hell for them anyways. Let them suffer that. Let them suffer God's wrath for being insufferable racist pricks.

Tying in with the subject of historical blindness, they were also blind on the objectives of the Christian Church. Many of them saw the Church as supporters of nationalism, and yet, if one opens up a book on the Middle Ages, one can see that the Church tried to emphasize the Christian community as a whole, not restricted to race or nationality. In fact, the Papacy's attempts to unify all of Christendom under them was their dream of trying to make the "Kingdom of God" manifest as a political entity on earth. Same goes for kings and Emperors, who saw themselves as God's viceroys on this planet. To the alt-right, racial separation is natural, equality is spiritual, and racial equality, as well as trans-national unity, was a demonic idea, and they didn't care that the Church took both ideas to heart.

When Columbus tried to enslave Indians, the Queen of Spain, a devout Catholic, had him punished. Some missionaries campaigned against the slavery of Africans and Indians. Slaves, whether African or Indian, were still considered children of God and were baptized. In some cases, were even freed by members of the Church or by buying their own freedom. Slavery in Latin America was gradually eroded until it went away. Even in Protestant America, one half of the country was fiercely against slavery because the idea of one man being able to oppress another offended them so greatly that religious abolitionist radicals were willing to go into pro-slave territories and either smuggle slaves into freedom or try and raise slave revolts against their masters. Christianity, in the end, got rid of slavery, and during the age of Imperialism, forced other countries, like the West African slave kingdoms, to get rid of it as well. The alt-right Christians would be proud of these anti-slave efforts, and they would try to show these examples to show how civilized the white man was, yet they didn't realize the core of these undertakings: these Christians didn't get rid of slavery out of mere sympathetic sentimentality. They did so because the idea of race-based slavery offended them to the core, and so they persuaded the papacy, the Latino governments, the US Union forces, and the British Navy to act and get rid of it.

The very same logic that these abolitionists pursued is what drove the Civil Rights movement in the 60's, which many in the alt-right don't agree with. And yet, they don't realize that these sentiments of racial equality was very much based on Christian ideology: verses like Galatians 3:28 mocked the idea of racial separation by saying that “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” The Bible foretold of many races coming together to bask in the glory of the Lord, nations from the far ends of the Earth uniting in one glorious chorus of praise. And yet, to the alt-right, the fact that some of these believers come from races they despise means they can never break bread with them. Even if they believe in the same God who saved the human race with the spilling of HIS blood.

But of course, to the alt-right, religion exists as something for them to boast about their ancestors. Or a tool, for them to blast feminists and women with. But when it comes to their own man-whoring, it might as well not even exist. A man has sex with twelve young women? He's an alpha male, a manly man, a hero! A woman has sex with ten different guys? WHORE! SHAME! SHAME! SHAME! For a bunch of people who hate Islam, it's quite funny that they have a very Islamic view of sex. A man is allowed to have sex with many women, indeed, he is even allowed to keep multiple women. But a woman having sex with anyone else that she's not married to? Shame the bitch until she wishes she was stoned to death. The only difference between alt-right keyboard warriors and the real Jihadists is that the latter aren't afraid to kill for their beliefs.

A small group in the alt-right are atheists and pagans who detest Christianity, but their hilarious existence is befuddled by the fact that paganism had no central tenets, just beliefs in many gods who are just personifications of supernatural forces, while atheism has no core values whatsoever, aside from materialism. Some of these guys hilariously use the same attacks against Christianity that feminists and SJWs use against the faith, but then suddenly veer to the right when it comes to political issues. Some of them will attack Christianity because it DOES promote racial equality and they realize that. They then try to replace it with a sense paganism, whether it be the classical paganism of the Greeks and Romans or the ethnic paganism of Germans and Vikings.

These pagans claim that these religions were far more dignified than Christianity. They forgot that the Roman pagans were tearing each other apart in the Crisis of the Third Century, and by the time reformers like Diocletian and Constantine came over, there was precious little of the Empire's former strength to salvage. The alt-right classical pagans conveniently forget this. Whereareas on the other hand, the Germanic pagans were considered to be the savages and barbarians by the Roman world, good for nothing but cheap labor and cannon fodder. The Vikings were little better, acting as raiders and bandits of the sea, ferocious when fighting against defenseless monks, but not so ferocious when fighting knights in castles. It's quite funny for these alt-right white guys to promote a culture that was considered barbaric when they also look down on other races as barbarians. For all the praise Germanic culture gets now from European enthusiasts, they were considered by Romans in the same way blacks were in Dixie South before the Civil Rights act.

Atheist alt-righters, of course, are the biggest jokes on this side of the blogosphere. They reiterate the same points liberals state when attacking religions such as Christianity, but again, as with the alt-right pagans, suddenly find themselves to be conservative when dealing with race, economics, and politics. And again, of course, this is a laughable joke. So, religion is an oppressive tool of domination, but capitalism is liberty? If the left is right about religion, why are they wrong on other issues like race, sex, and economics? On what authority are they blasting religion? What moral authority makes the secular alt-right superior to the left? At this case, even the left looks morally superior, because at least they take care of each other, unlike the atheist alt-right, which makes the religious in the alt-right look consistent in comparison.

To put this whole thing into perspective, the alt-right is the worst possible counter against feminism, SJWs, and Islamic influence that the West has right now. The alt-right condemns women for promiscuous and careless behavior, but its adherents aren't afraid of acting like man-whores themselves. They pose as a counter to the Social Justice Warriors, yet they get triggered like SJWs do whenever people entertain the idea of racial equality or race-mixing in front of them. They love to blast Islam for "barbaric behavior", yet their ideas on sex and women show similar lines of thinking and shaming as that of the Islamic radicals. The alt-right loves to pose as a defender of traditional religion, like Christianity, but when push comes to shove, they can't even live up to its mantras when it cramps their style when they man-whore with the ladies. (And of course, the pagans and atheists on the alt right are an outright joke.) In the end, they are a group bound together by their singular hatred for the left, but they have their own moralities that make them potentially even worse than the left ever could be. It's like when the left accuses people of being racist or sexist, then suddenly, actual racists and sexists that fit that profile appear. Today's political sphere is like an endless waltz of madness and stupidity.

During the time before Gamergate came out, feminists lambasted female action heroes in games, comics, and other media, for being "sex symbols" made to appeal to men with sex appeal. The alt-right makes the same condemnation, but not because it makes men horny, but rather, because the empowered female trope is, as they say, "unrealistic". This despite the fact that A) this is fantasy, and therefore, realism is not the main concern of the work, and B) there have been examples of women in history have been able to train and fight like men, only in a reduced manner because it was just more convenient for them and their families to have them train to be housewives and mothers instead. It's quite funny, actually. Just as the left went from libertines to social justice enforcers who balk about virtues, so too did the alt-right turn from a place where one can critique the SJWs, into a dark parody of the SJWs, a macabre joke that refuses to acknowledge that it is, in fact, a joke. Even their goldenboy, President Donald Trump, disavowed them, first by denouncing racist attacks made during his first few months in office, and then by attacking Syria, which is an ally of Russia, which, since Russia is a white country with "traditionalist morals" and no connection to the "globalist agenda", was a big no-no for the alt right. Never mind that Russia is attacking other Christian nations like the Ukraine. Never mind that it widely allows abortion of its own people and is supporting Muslim extremists in Iran by helping them get nukes. Once again, the alt-right is great at ignoring things that don't agree with their extreme points of view.

As long as the alt-right continues to pose itself as the defender of traditionalist morals against the left, the more and more the actual traditionalists and conservatives who wish to be left in peace are associated with them. And that's just sad, because many traditionalists don't want to be associated with the alt-right. Many of them just want to be left in peace. Many of them don't have such racist views of other races or such contradictory morals when it comes to sex. Many of them aren't nutjobs who scream conspiracy the moment that Jews are mentioned. Many of them are good, honest, decent people who should not be associated with a movement that is losing credibility thanks to its very own actions.

I remember the old days, back in the early 2000s. Where the only thing that the left cared about was helping the poor and the environment, and all the right cared about was preserving morality and economic stability. Back then when people from the left and the right can talk with each other as friends instead of making all sorts of accusations and theories concerning racist/sexist/homophobic shitlords and Globalist/Jewish/Illuminati conspirators. And I ask, why can't we go back to those old days? I feel like an old man now, looking at these new political movements and having to re-orient myself to them. "So that's what the youngsters are into nowadays", I keep telling myself. And the alt-right is part of that reason. Despite the fact that I'd love to be the first guy to rip into the excesses of the Social Justice movement, I can at least vouch for them when it comes to their demeanor. They're people with the right motivations, but the wrong methods of getting to their goals. The alt-right is just insane-bristling with the kind of racism and hate that haven't been seen in decades in the West. And it saddens me to see them stealing the banner of Western Civilization and brandishing it around like it belonged to them. It's a modern day tragedy that they're what passes for traditionalism nowadays. No scholasticism, no inquisitive spirits, just conspiracy theories, man-whoring, and baseless hate for other races and blaming them for the woes of the west.

And for that, I feel sad.